arabellesicardi:

hazelcills:

cc: Arabelle

god bless

everyone’s liking and reblogging this again which reminded me that I need it here, as a reminder.

arabellesicardi:

hazelcills:

cc: Arabelle

god bless

everyone’s liking and reblogging this again which reminded me that I need it here, as a reminder.

(Source: aviatrixie, via arabellesicardi)

This was posted 46 minutes ago. It has 96 notes.
charlottecullen:

C(r)yborg

charlottecullen:

C(r)yborg

(via karaj)

This was posted 20 hours ago. It has 206 notes.

I’ve unsubscribed from all my travel mailing lists and Spanish groupon emails, I’ve scoured pedestrian.tv for jobs and noted down submission dates for a bunch of journals, I’ve reblogged a few of karaj’s posts, I’ve changed my current location on facebook. I’m home and I’m Very Serious about Being Home.

This was posted 21 hours ago. It has 1 note.

karaj:

tremblebot:

…I was pretty miserable through the whole process not because writing a dissertation is always already awful, although it can be, but rather I was trapped in a miserable cycle of using ideas I hated as a main pillar to cast my own ideas against. It was awful. Elizabeth Grosz pointed this all out to me by talking gently about how she writes and thinks. I was sitting in on a seminar she was teaching and she started talking about how she doesn’t respond to critiques anymore. She doesn’t not read them, but she doesn’t acknowledge them in her own work. She makes HER argument, she produces HER ideas on their own terms. She made Nietzsche and Deleuze make more sense in three weeks than I thought was humanly possible, but that’s where it came from for her. If you acknowledge the critique, if you build your entire idea as an answer to an opposing theory then you necessarily have to prove that theory, the one you disagree with or hate, as true in order to refute it. It was really simple and beautiful and changed the way that I write and think. It’s probably pretty frustrating to read because there is nothing to ground an argument in but the idea itself. I try to write productively, without the lack, the negative of an opposing view, because, quite frankly, I don’t want to be so fucking miserable all the time. Happiness is a real thing. Like Spinoza, I believe in joy.

I’ve been thinking all morning about intensity. Intensity is a measure of qualitative difference such that when divided in half it does not produce two equal parts. Changes in temperature, pressure, velocity—measured in intensity—are all qualitative differences. Intensity isn’t quantitative. Intensity is about states, not identities, not numbers. If you divided boiling water in half you wouldn’t get two half boiling temperature pots of water. When water reaches it’s most intense moment in the boiling process, when it passes a certain degree, the whole system shifts into water vapor. At its most intense water shifts into vapor. It doesn’t stay in that state indefinitely. Intensity doesn’t have maximums, intensity has limits at which things qualitatively change. Deleuze calls these moments of radical qualitative phase state shifts singularities. One of the big takeaways is that liquid water, has the potential of becoming vapor folded into its being. The folded, unseen potential for water to become vapor is the virtual. There is absolutely nothing symbolic about this process. It is actual. It is material. It is based in the laws of matter. Call it a realist ontology, call it thermo-dynamic philosophy, call it whatever you want, but it is definitely an articulation of living being, an ontology of difference. Such an ontology of difference wholly focuses on creation rather than elimination. There is no lack in this model, only making stuff of other stuff to make more new stuff. There are limits but no maximums…

i would recommend reading the whole thing. 

This was posted 21 hours ago. It has 46 notes.

emptybeautybrains:

PAUL MARCUS FUOG

(Source: fleeten, via karaj)

This was posted 21 hours ago. It has 44,266 notes.

burrito-princess:

cvnvr:

Lana Del Rey - West Coast (Studio Version)

MY QUEEN

(Source: dyonisius)

This was posted 2 days ago. It has 1,448 notes. Played 8,640 times.

Switzerland is as expensive as they warn you; living on diet of pills, gin and tonics, Lindt balls and McDonald’s veggie burgers (have eaten two today) ((it costs about $7.50))

This was posted 2 months ago. It has 2 notes.

rgr-pop:

In conclusion, never write, because you will only end up eaten by men, chewed up by men, spit on the sidewalk and stuck to the sole of a thirty dollar imitation leather oxford attached to the leg of the kinda guy who wears blazers over his t-shirt

This was posted 2 months ago. It has 31 notes.